Back to results

Mullaloo vs Morley — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Mullaloo

    WA · 6027
    62Strong
    Median
    $1.09M
    5y growth
    9.4%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Morley

    WA · 6062
    68Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    10.4%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Mullaloo
Morley
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
949.4%/yr
10010.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
452.2%
502.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
751.0%
751.0%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6817.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2727% under cap
5050% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
95-9.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Mullaloo

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Morley

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Mullaloo

Growth-led, low cashflow

population +12.6% (5y), 9.4%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.4%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.0%
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.2%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Morley

Stable entry · room to scale

10.4%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.4%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Supply tightening-9.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.0%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state