Back to results

Sunshine vs Midland — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Sunshine

    VIC · 3020
    71Strong
    Median
    $825k
    5y growth
    7.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Midland

    WA · 6056
    67Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Sunshine
Midland
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
757.5%/yr
10010.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
432.1%
562.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
651.4%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
100$9.1bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4545% under cap
6464% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Sunshine

    2/8
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

  2. Midland

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

Why Sunshine

Stable entry · room to scale

$9.1bn pipeline incl. Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub, listings tightening 6.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$9.1bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Capital growth7.5%/yr
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.1%)

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub0.0 kmApproved · 2033

Why Midland

Stable entry · room to scale

10.5%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state