Back to results

Undercliffe vs Clyde — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Undercliffe

    NSW · 2206
    56Average
    Median
    $1.30M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Clyde

    NSW · 2142
    57Average
    Median
    $1.30M
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Undercliffe
Clyde
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
221.1%
703.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
85$4.2bn
52$2.6bn
Affordability
weight 8%
1313% under cap
1313% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Undercliffe

    1/8
    • Construction pipeline

  2. Clyde

    1/8
    • Rental yield

Why Undercliffe

Stable entry point

$4.2bn pipeline incl. WestConnex M4–M5 Link, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$4.2bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (1.1%)

Construction ·WestConnex M4–M5 Link2.0 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Clyde

Stable entry point

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, 3.5% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Rental yield3.5%
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·Parramatta Light Rail Stage 21.8 kmApproved · 2031