Back to results

Wanguri vs South Brisbane — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Wanguri

    NT · 0810
    48Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    4.8%/yr
    YieldStable entry · room to scale

  2. South Brisbane

    QLD · 4101
    71Strong
    Median
    $1.50M
    5y growth
    9.4%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Wanguri
South Brisbane
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
484.8%/yr
949.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
723.6%
331.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
452.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
75$3.8bn
Affordability
weight 8%
6060% under cap
00% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
45+1.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Wanguri

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. South Brisbane

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

Why Wanguri

Stable entry · room to scale

3.6% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield3.6%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
  • Budget headroom60% under cap
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why South Brisbane

Stable but fully priced

population +10.0% (5y), 9.4%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Capital growth9.4%/yr
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Infrastructure pipeline$3.8bn nearby
Risks
  • At top of budget (100% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·Brisbane Metro1.0 kmConstruction · 2025