Back to results

Wanguri vs Woolloongabba — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Wanguri

    NT · 0810
    48Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    4.8%/yr
    YieldStable entry · room to scale

  2. Woolloongabba

    QLD · 4102
    76Standout
    Median
    $1.40M
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Wanguri
Woolloongabba
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
484.8%/yr
10010.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
723.6%
331.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
452.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
10010.0%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
7218.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
100$13.2bn
Affordability
weight 8%
6060% under cap
77% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
45+1.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Wanguri

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Woolloongabba

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

Why Wanguri

Stable entry · room to scale

3.6% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield3.6%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
  • Budget headroom60% under cap
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Woolloongabba

Stable but fully priced

10.5%/yr capital growth, population +10.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Population growth+10.0% (5y)
  • Infrastructure pipeline$13.2bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (93% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (1.6%)

Construction ·Cross River Rail — Woolloongabba0.0 kmConstruction · 2026