Back to results

Yarraville vs Currambine — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $1.50Mbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Yarraville

    VIC · 3013
    69Strong
    Median
    $1.20M
    5y growth
    6.3%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Currambine

    WA · 6028
    66Strong
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    11.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Yarraville
Currambine
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
636.3%/yr
10011.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
402.0%
562.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
8421.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
100$10.4bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2020% under cap
5050% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Yarraville

    3/8
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

  2. Currambine

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

Why Yarraville

Stable entry point

$10.4bn pipeline incl. West Gate Tunnel, listings tightening 7.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Infrastructure pipeline$10.4bn nearby
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+21.0% (5y)
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.0%)

Construction ·West Gate Tunnel0.0 kmConstruction · 2025

Why Currambine

Stable entry · room to scale

11.2%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.2%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state