Back to results

Coleraine vs Kaniva — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $300kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Coleraine

    VIC · 3315
    25Below trend
    Median
    $175k
    5y growth
    3.9%/yr
    YieldThin market · ~1.1k residents

  2. Kaniva

    VIC · 3419
    22Below trend
    Median
    $120k
    5y growth
    -6.7%/yr
    YieldThin market · ~0.9k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Coleraine
Kaniva
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
393.9%/yr
0-6.7%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
834.2%
1005.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4242% under cap
6060% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
25+5.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Coleraine

    1/8
    • Capital growth (5y)

  2. Kaniva

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Coleraine

Thin market · ~1.1k residents

4.2% gross yield, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.2%
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 1,062 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • Modest 5y growth (3.9%/yr)

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub276.3 kmApproved · 2033

Why Kaniva

Thin market · ~0.9k residents

5.4% gross yield, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield5.4%
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Budget headroom60% under cap
Risks
  • Only 891 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • Modest 5y growth (-6.7%/yr)

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub357.0 kmApproved · 2033