Back to results

Coonamble vs Rainbow — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $300kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Coonamble

    NSW · 2829
    34Below trend
    Median
    $178k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldThin market · ~3k residents

  2. Rainbow

    VIC · 3424
    28Below trend
    Median
    $235k
    5y growth
    25.7%/yr
    GrowthThin market · ~0.7k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Coonamble
Rainbow
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
10025.7%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
1005.6%
442.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
352.6%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4141% under cap
2222% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
20+6.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Coonamble

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Rainbow

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Coonamble

Thin market · ~3k residents

5.6% gross yield, population +6.5% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield5.6%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 2,666 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • Listings up 6.0% YoY — supply easing

Construction ·Sydney Metro — Western Sydney Airport393.0 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Rainbow

Thin market · ~0.7k residents

25.7%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth25.7%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 672 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • Thin gross yield (2.2%)

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub328.0 kmApproved · 2033