Back to results

Corryong vs Coleraine — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $300kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Corryong

    VIC · 3707
    24Below trend
    Median
    $285k
    5y growth
    3.8%/yr
    YieldThin market · ~1.4k residents

  2. Coleraine

    VIC · 3315
    25Below trend
    Median
    $175k
    5y growth
    3.9%/yr
    YieldThin market · ~1.1k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Corryong
Coleraine
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
383.8%/yr
393.9%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
733.6%
834.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
55% under cap
4242% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
25+5.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Corryong

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Coleraine

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Corryong

Thin market · ~1.4k residents

population +7.8% (5y), 3.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.6%
Risks
  • Only 1,352 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • At top of budget (95% of cap)

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Box Hill305.8 kmConstruction · 2035

Why Coleraine

Thin market · ~1.1k residents

4.2% gross yield, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.2%
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 1,062 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • Modest 5y growth (3.9%/yr)

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub276.3 kmApproved · 2033