Back to results

Sea Lake vs Angus — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $300kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Sea Lake

    VIC · 3533
    32Below trend
    Median
    $160k
    5y growth
    9.9%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~0.6k residents

  2. Angus

    NSW · 2765
    54Average
    Median
    $225k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Sea Lake
Angus
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
999.9%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
914.5%
1008.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4747% under cap
2525% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
25+5.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Sea Lake

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

  2. Angus

    4/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Sea Lake

Thin market · ~0.6k residents

9.9%/yr capital growth, 4.5% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.9%/yr
  • Rental yield4.5%
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 619 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub309.0 kmApproved · 2033

Why Angus

Stable entry point

8.1% gross yield, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield8.1%
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·M12 Motorway19.5 kmConstruction · 2026