Back to results

Deepwater vs Condobolin — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $400kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Deepwater

    NSW · 2371
    27Below trend
    Median
    $80k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldThin market · ~0.5k residents

  2. Condobolin

    NSW · 2877
    30Below trend
    Median
    $375k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~3k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Deepwater
Condobolin
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
10013.0%
552.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
352.6%
352.6%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
8080% under cap
66% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
20+6.0% YoY
20+6.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Deepwater

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Condobolin

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Deepwater

Thin market · ~0.5k residents

13.0% gross yield, 80% under your cap.

Drivers
  • Rental yield13.0%
  • Budget headroom80% under cap
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 456 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • Listings up 6.0% YoY — supply easing

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Parramatta492.4 kmConstruction · 2030

Why Condobolin

Thin market · ~3k residents

population +6.5% (5y), 2.8% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 3,185 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • At top of budget (94% of cap)

Construction ·Sydney Metro — Western Sydney Airport344.4 kmConstruction · 2026