Back to results

Hay vs Hamilton — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $400kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Hay

    NSW · 2711
    26Below trend
    Median
    $365k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~2k residents

  2. Hamilton

    VIC · 3300
    53Average
    Median
    $360k
    5y growth
    11.4%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Hay
Hamilton
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
10011.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
502.5%
683.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
352.6%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
99% under cap
1010% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
20+6.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Hay

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Hamilton

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Hay

Thin market · ~2k residents

population +6.5% (5y), incomes +13.0% (5y).

Drivers
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 2,300 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)

Construction ·Sydney Metro — Western Sydney Airport546.3 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Hamilton

Stable but fully priced

11.4%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.4%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.4%
Risks
  • At top of budget (90% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub247.3 kmApproved · 2033