Back to results

Manilla vs Moree — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $400kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Manilla

    NSW · 2346
    28Below trend
    Median
    $383k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldThin market · ~2k residents

  2. Moree

    NSW · 2400
    38Below trend
    Median
    $390k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    BalancedFully priced · supply easing

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Manilla
Moree
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
713.5%
613.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
352.6%
352.6%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
44% under cap
33% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
20+6.0% YoY
20+6.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Manilla

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Moree

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Manilla

Thin market · ~2k residents

3.5% gross yield, population +6.5% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield3.5%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 2,386 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • At top of budget (96% of cap)

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Parramatta343.8 kmConstruction · 2030

Why Moree

Fully priced · supply easing

population +6.5% (5y), 3.1% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.1%
Risks
  • At top of budget (98% of cap)
  • Listings up 6.0% YoY — supply easing

Construction ·Sydney Metro West — Parramatta496.1 kmConstruction · 2030