Back to results

Moe vs Kalgoorlie — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $400kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Moe

    VIC · 3825
    53Average
    Median
    $339k
    5y growth
    10.1%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Kalgoorlie

    WA · 6430
    46Average
    Median
    $395k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~4k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Moe
Kalgoorlie
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.1%/yr
727.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
613.1%
793.9%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
502.0%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1515% under cap
11% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
25+5.0% YoY
40+2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Moe

    2/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Affordability

  2. Kalgoorlie

    5/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Moe

Stable entry point

10.1%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.1%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.1%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Glen Waverley101.9 kmConstruction · 2035

Why Kalgoorlie

Thin market · ~4k residents

population +12.6% (5y), 3.9% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.9%
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
  • Income growth+15.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 3,711 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)