Back to results

Robinvale vs Horsham — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $400kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Robinvale

    VIC · 3549
    39Below trend
    Median
    $315k
    5y growth
    6.4%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~3k residents

  2. Horsham

    VIC · 3400
    40Below trend
    Median
    $306k
    5y growth
    2.6%/yr
    YieldLate-cycle hold

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Robinvale
Horsham
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
646.4%/yr
262.6%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
733.6%
834.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2121% under cap
2424% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
25+5.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Robinvale

    1/8
    • Capital growth (5y)

  2. Horsham

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Robinvale

Thin market · ~3k residents

population +7.8% (5y), 3.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.6%
  • Capital growth6.4%/yr
Risks
  • Only 3,497 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub400.5 kmApproved · 2033

Why Horsham

Late-cycle hold

4.2% gross yield, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.2%
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Modest 5y growth (2.6%/yr)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub262.8 kmApproved · 2033