Back to results

Stawell vs Mount Gambier — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $400kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Stawell

    VIC · 3380
    54Average
    Median
    $315k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Mount Gambier

    SA · 5290
    46Average
    Median
    $395k
    5y growth
    8.2%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Stawell
Mount Gambier
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.8%/yr
828.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
693.5%
582.9%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
4411.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2121% under cap
11% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
25+5.0% YoY
40+2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Stawell

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability

  2. Mount Gambier

    1/8
    • Supply tightening

Why Stawell

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.5%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub198.9 kmApproved · 2033

Why Mount Gambier

Stable but fully priced

8.2%/yr capital growth, population +6.5% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth8.2%/yr
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state