Back to results

Devonport vs Ulverstone — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $500kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Devonport

    TAS · 7310
    40Below trend
    Median
    $495k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

  2. Ulverstone

    TAS · 7315
    40Below trend
    Median
    $495k
    5y growth
    7.0%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Devonport
Ulverstone
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
727.2%/yr
707.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
532.6%
532.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
4812.0%
4812.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
11% under cap
11% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
500.0% YoY
500.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Devonport

    1/8
    • Capital growth (5y)

  2. Ulverstone

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Devonport

Stable but fully priced

7.2%/yr capital growth, 2.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus71.3 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Ulverstone

Stable but fully priced

7.0%/yr capital growth, 2.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.0%/yr
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus85.2 kmRecently completed · 2024