Back to results

Geeveston vs Angus — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $500kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Geeveston

    TAS · 7116
    26Below trend
    Median
    $425k
    5y growth
    8.2%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~1.4k residents

  2. Angus

    NSW · 2765
    57Average
    Median
    $225k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Geeveston
Angus
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
828.2%/yr
505.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
663.3%
1008.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
352.6%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
4411.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1515% under cap
5555% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Geeveston

    1/8
    • Capital growth (5y)

  2. Angus

    6/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Geeveston

Thin market · ~1.4k residents

8.2%/yr capital growth, 3.3% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth8.2%/yr
  • Rental yield3.3%
Risks
  • Only 1,431 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Royal Hobart Hospital — Stage 345.0 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Angus

Stable entry · room to scale

8.1% gross yield, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield8.1%
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·M12 Motorway19.5 kmConstruction · 2026