Back to results

Geraldton vs Kalgoorlie — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $500kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Geraldton

    WA · 6530
    46Average
    Median
    $445k
    5y growth
    10.6%/yr
    GrowthThin market · ~3k residents

  2. Kalgoorlie

    WA · 6430
    47Average
    Median
    $395k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~4k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Geraldton
Kalgoorlie
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.6%/yr
727.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
512.6%
793.9%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
502.0%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1111% under cap
2121% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
40+2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Geraldton

    1/8
    • Capital growth (5y)

  2. Kalgoorlie

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Geraldton

Thin market · ~3k residents

10.6%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.6%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Income growth+15.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 3,246 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Kalgoorlie

Thin market · ~4k residents

population +12.6% (5y), 3.9% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.9%
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
  • Income growth+15.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 3,711 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state