Back to results

Geraldton vs Travancore — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $500kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Geraldton

    WA · 6530
    46Average
    Median
    $445k
    5y growth
    10.6%/yr
    GrowthThin market · ~3k residents

  2. Travancore

    VIC · 3032
    48Average
    Median
    $350k
    5y growth
    -3.9%/yr
    YieldLate-cycle hold

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Geraldton
Travancore
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.6%/yr
0-3.9%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
512.6%
1005.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
8421.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1111% under cap
3030% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
85-7.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Geraldton

    2/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Population growth

  2. Travancore

    5/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Geraldton

Thin market · ~3k residents

10.6%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.6%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Income growth+15.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 3,246 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Travancore

Late-cycle hold

5.2% gross yield, listings tightening 7.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield5.2%
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+21.0% (5y)
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Modest 5y growth (-3.9%/yr)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Metro Tunnel — Parkville Station2.2 kmRecently completed · 2025