Back to results

Scottsdale vs Maffra — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $500kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Scottsdale

    TAS · 7260
    28Below trend
    Median
    $425k
    5y growth
    7.0%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~2k residents

  2. Maffra

    VIC · 3860
    50Average
    Median
    $498k
    5y growth
    14.3%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Scottsdale
Maffra
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
707.0%/yr
10014.3%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
512.6%
522.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
352.6%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
4411.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1515% under cap
11% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Scottsdale

    2/8
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

  2. Maffra

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth

Why Scottsdale

Thin market · ~2k residents

7.0%/yr capital growth, 2.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.0%/yr
Risks
  • Only 2,408 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus42.6 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Maffra

Stable but fully priced

14.3%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth14.3%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (100% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Glen Waverley160.3 kmConstruction · 2035