Back to results

Travancore vs Murray Bridge — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $500kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Travancore

    VIC · 3032
    48Average
    Median
    $350k
    5y growth
    -3.9%/yr
    YieldLate-cycle hold

  2. Murray Bridge

    SA · 5253
    50Average
    Median
    $395k
    5y growth
    9.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Travancore
Murray Bridge
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
0-3.9%/yr
929.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
1005.2%
633.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
8421.0%
4411.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
3030% under cap
2121% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
85-7.0% YoY
40+2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Travancore

    6/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

  2. Murray Bridge

    1/8
    • Capital growth (5y)

Why Travancore

Late-cycle hold

5.2% gross yield, listings tightening 7.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield5.2%
  • Supply tightening-7.0% YoY
  • Income growth+21.0% (5y)
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Modest 5y growth (-3.9%/yr)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Metro Tunnel — Parkville Station2.2 kmRecently completed · 2025

Why Murray Bridge

Stable entry point

9.2%/yr capital growth, population +6.5% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.2%/yr
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.2%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state