Back to results

Triabunna vs Wynyard — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $500kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Triabunna

    TAS · 7190
    21Below trend
    Median
    $495k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    GrowthThin market · ~0.9k residents

  2. Wynyard

    TAS · 7325
    41Below trend
    Median
    $445k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Triabunna
Wynyard
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
727.2%/yr
727.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
512.6%
522.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
352.6%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
4411.0%
4812.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
11% under cap
1111% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
500.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Triabunna

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Wynyard

    5/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Triabunna

Thin market · ~0.9k residents

7.2%/yr capital growth, 2.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
Risks
  • Only 905 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)

Construction ·New Bridgewater Bridge60.9 kmConstruction · 2025

Why Wynyard

Stable entry point

7.2%/yr capital growth, 2.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus127.2 kmRecently completed · 2024