Back to results

Albany vs Noarlunga — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Albany

    WA · 6330
    32Below trend
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    8.2%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~1.4k residents

  2. Noarlunga

    SA · 5168
    62Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Albany
Noarlunga
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
828.2%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
623.1%
884.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
99% under cap
99% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Albany

    1/8
    • Population growth

  2. Noarlunga

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Supply tightening

Why Albany

Thin market · ~1.4k residents

population +12.6% (5y), 8.2%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Capital growth8.2%/yr
  • Rental yield3.1%
  • Income growth+15.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 1,403 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)

Why Noarlunga

Stable but fully priced

10.8%/yr capital growth, 4.4% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Rental yield4.4%
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state