Back to results

Brighton vs Sorell — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Brighton

    TAS · 7030
    50Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    8.2%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

  2. Sorell

    TAS · 7172
    47Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    7.4%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Brighton
Sorell
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
828.2%/yr
747.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
673.3%
613.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
1$0.1bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
99% under cap
11% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Brighton

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Construction pipeline
    • Affordability

  2. Sorell

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Brighton

Stable but fully priced

8.2%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth8.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Rental yield3.3%
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)

Construction ·New Bridgewater Bridge3.6 kmConstruction · 2025

Why Sorell

Stable but fully priced

7.4%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.4%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Rental yield3.1%
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Macquarie Point Stadium21.5 kmPlanned · 2029