Back to results

Claremont vs Shepparton — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Claremont

    TAS · 7011
    47Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    7.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Shepparton

    VIC · 3630
    53Average
    Median
    $480k
    5y growth
    11.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Claremont
Shepparton
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
787.8%/yr
10011.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
562.8%
592.9%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0$0.0bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
11% under cap
2020% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Claremont

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

  2. Shepparton

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

Why Claremont

Stable but fully priced

7.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)

Construction ·New Bridgewater Bridge4.9 kmConstruction · 2025

Why Shepparton

Stable entry point

11.2%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.2%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·North East Link — Bulleen156.9 kmConstruction · 2028