Back to results

Durack vs Katherine — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Durack

    NT · 0830
    48Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    5.8%/yr
    YieldStable but fully priced

  2. Katherine

    NT · 0850
    25Below trend
    Median
    $445k
    5y growth
    4.8%/yr
    YieldThin market · ~1.3k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Durack
Katherine
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
585.8%/yr
484.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
874.4%
844.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
717.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5614.0%
4010.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
11% under cap
2626% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
500.0% YoY
30+4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Durack

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Katherine

    1/8
    • Affordability

Why Durack

Stable but fully priced

4.4% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.4%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Katherine

Thin market · ~1.3k residents

4.2% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.2%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 1,254 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state