Back to results

Frankston North vs Gawler — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Frankston North

    VIC · 3200
    53Average
    Median
    $591k
    5y growth
    6.9%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

  2. Gawler

    SA · 5118
    56Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Frankston North
Gawler
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
696.9%/yr
10010.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
552.8%
462.3%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
5614.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
22% under cap
99% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Frankston North

    4/8
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Gawler

    2/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Affordability

Why Frankston North

Stable but fully priced

listings tightening 6.0% YoY, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Capital growth6.9%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Cheltenham19.7 kmConstruction · 2035

Why Gawler

Stable but fully priced

10.5%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.3%)