Back to results

Kings Meadows vs Moe — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Kings Meadows

    TAS · 7249
    42Below trend
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    6.2%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

  2. Moe

    VIC · 3825
    55Average
    Median
    $339k
    5y growth
    10.1%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Kings Meadows
Moe
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
626.2%/yr
10010.1%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
603.0%
613.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
551.8%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
99% under cap
4444% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
60-2.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Kings Meadows

    2/8
    • Rental demand
    • Supply tightening

  2. Moe

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

Why Kings Meadows

Stable but fully priced

6.2%/yr capital growth, 3.0% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth6.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-2.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus6.4 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Moe

Stable entry · room to scale

10.1%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.1%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.1%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Glen Waverley101.9 kmConstruction · 2035