Back to results

Morphett Vale vs Salisbury — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Morphett Vale

    SA · 5162
    56Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Salisbury

    SA · 5108
    56Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Morphett Vale
Salisbury
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.5%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
522.6%
502.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
5614.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
11% under cap
99% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Morphett Vale

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth

  2. Salisbury

    2/8
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Morphett Vale

Stable but fully priced

10.5%/yr capital growth, tight 1.2% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Salisbury

Stable but fully priced

10.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.5%)