Back to results

Penguin vs Punchbowl — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Penguin

    TAS · 7316
    36Below trend
    Median
    $525k
    5y growth
    6.8%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~4k residents

  2. Punchbowl

    TAS · 7249
    41Below trend
    Median
    $565k
    5y growth
    6.3%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Penguin
Punchbowl
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
686.8%/yr
636.3%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
522.6%
512.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
551.8%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
4812.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1313% under cap
66% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
500.0% YoY
60-2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Penguin

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Punchbowl

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Penguin

Thin market · ~4k residents

6.8%/yr capital growth, 2.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth6.8%/yr
Risks
  • Only 4,132 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus94.9 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Punchbowl

Stable but fully priced

6.3%/yr capital growth, tight 1.8% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Capital growth6.3%/yr
  • Supply tightening-2.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (94% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus5.4 kmRecently completed · 2024