Back to results

Salisbury vs Armadale — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Salisbury

    SA · 5108
    56Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Armadale

    WA · 6112
    62Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Salisbury
Armadale
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.8%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
502.5%
522.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
5614.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
99% under cap
99% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Salisbury

    1/8
    • Supply tightening

  2. Armadale

    4/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth

Why Salisbury

Stable but fully priced

10.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.5%)

Why Armadale

Stable but fully priced

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state