Back to results

Salisbury vs Tatura — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Salisbury

    SA · 5108
    56Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Tatura

    VIC · 3616
    53Average
    Median
    $455k
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthThin market · ~5k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Salisbury
Tatura
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.8%/yr
10010.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
502.5%
562.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
5614.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
99% under cap
2424% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Salisbury

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Tatura

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth
    • Affordability

Why Salisbury

Stable but fully priced

10.8%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (91% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.5%)

Why Tatura

Thin market · ~5k residents

10.5%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 4,955 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·North East Link — Bulleen149.0 kmConstruction · 2028