Back to results

Smithton vs Red Cliffs — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $600kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Smithton

    TAS · 7330
    36Below trend
    Median
    $425k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~4k residents

  2. Red Cliffs

    VIC · 3496
    54Average
    Median
    $400k
    5y growth
    13.0%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Smithton
Red Cliffs
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
727.2%/yr
10013.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
542.7%
623.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
352.6%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
4411.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2929% under cap
3333% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Smithton

    1/8
    • Supply tightening

  2. Red Cliffs

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability

Why Smithton

Thin market · ~4k residents

7.2%/yr capital growth, 2.7% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
Risks
  • Only 3,934 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus180.9 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Red Cliffs

Stable entry point

13.0%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth13.0%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.1%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub454.0 kmApproved · 2033