Back to results

Bridgewater vs Reynella — which is best for infrastructure?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $700kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bridgewater

    TAS · 7030
    53Average
    Median
    $495k
    5y growth
    8.4%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Reynella

    SA · 5161
    56Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bridgewater
Reynella
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
848.4%/yr
989.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
552.7%
522.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
16$0.8bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2929% under cap
88% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bridgewater

    3/8
    • Rental yield
    • Construction pipeline
    • Affordability

  2. Reynella

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth

Why Bridgewater

Stable entry point

8.4%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth8.4%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·New Bridgewater Bridge0.0 kmConstruction · 2025

Why Reynella

Stable but fully priced

9.8%/yr capital growth, tight 1.2% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (92% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state