Back to results

Cannington vs Midland — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $700kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Cannington

    WA · 6107
    61Strong
    Median
    $695k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

  2. Midland

    WA · 6056
    63Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.5%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Cannington
Midland
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10010.8%/yr
10010.5%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
522.6%
562.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
701.2%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
10012.6%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
11% under cap
2222% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Cannington

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Midland

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Cannington

Stable but fully priced

10.8%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • At top of budget (99% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Midland

Stable entry point

10.5%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.5%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state