Back to results

Churchill vs Ellenbrook — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $700kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Churchill

    VIC · 3842
    56Average
    Median
    $345k
    5y growth
    13.3%/yr
    GrowthThin market · ~5k residents

  2. Ellenbrook

    WA · 6069
    63Strong
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    11.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Churchill
Ellenbrook
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
10013.3%/yr
10011.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
693.5%
613.1%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
10012.6%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
5151% under cap
1515% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
25+5.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Churchill

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

  2. Ellenbrook

    4/8
    • Rental demand
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Churchill

Thin market · ~5k residents

13.3%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth13.3%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.5%
Risks
  • Only 4,924 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Glen Waverley120.0 kmConstruction · 2035

Why Ellenbrook

Stable entry point

11.8%/yr capital growth, population +12.6% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.8%/yr
  • Population growth+12.6% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state