Back to results

Katherine vs Hamilton — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $700kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Katherine

    NT · 0850
    26Below trend
    Median
    $445k
    5y growth
    4.8%/yr
    YieldThin market · ~1.3k residents

  2. Hamilton

    VIC · 3300
    56Average
    Median
    $360k
    5y growth
    11.4%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Katherine
Hamilton
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
484.8%/yr
10011.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
844.2%
683.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
4010.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
3636% under cap
4949% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
30+4.0% YoY
25+5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Katherine

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Supply tightening

  2. Hamilton

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability

Why Katherine

Thin market · ~1.3k residents

4.2% gross yield, population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.2%
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 1,254 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Hamilton

Stable entry · room to scale

11.4%/yr capital growth, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth11.4%/yr
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.4%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub247.3 kmApproved · 2033