Back to results

Kings Meadows vs Ulverstone — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $700kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Kings Meadows

    TAS · 7249
    43Below trend
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    6.2%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Ulverstone

    TAS · 7315
    42Below trend
    Median
    $495k
    5y growth
    7.0%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Kings Meadows
Ulverstone
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
626.2%/yr
707.0%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
603.0%
532.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
551.8%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
4812.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2222% under cap
2929% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
60-2.0% YoY
500.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Kings Meadows

    4/8
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Ulverstone

    2/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Affordability

Why Kings Meadows

Stable entry point

6.2%/yr capital growth, 3.0% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth6.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-2.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus6.4 kmRecently completed · 2024

Why Ulverstone

Stable entry point

7.0%/yr capital growth, 2.6% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.0%/yr
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·UTAS Launceston Inveresk Campus85.2 kmRecently completed · 2024