Back to results

Mornington vs Brighton — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $700kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Mornington

    TAS · 7018
    45Average
    Median
    $685k
    5y growth
    7.0%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

  2. Brighton

    TAS · 7030
    51Average
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    8.2%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Mornington
Brighton
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
707.0%/yr
828.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
522.6%
673.3%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5614.0%
5213.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
1$0.1bn
Affordability
weight 8%
22% under cap
2222% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Mornington

    2/8
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

  2. Brighton

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Construction pipeline
    • Affordability

Why Mornington

Stable but fully priced

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, 7.0%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Capital growth7.0%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • At top of budget (98% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Macquarie Point Stadium5.7 kmPlanned · 2029

Why Brighton

Stable entry point

8.2%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth8.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
  • Rental yield3.3%
Risks

No material risk flags raised by the model.

Construction ·New Bridgewater Bridge3.6 kmConstruction · 2025