Back to results

Murray Bridge vs Noarlunga — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $700kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Murray Bridge

    SA · 5253
    52Average
    Median
    $395k
    5y growth
    9.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Noarlunga

    SA · 5168
    63Strong
    Median
    $545k
    5y growth
    10.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Murray Bridge
Noarlunga
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
929.2%/yr
10010.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
633.2%
884.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
4411.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
4444% under cap
2222% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Murray Bridge

    1/8
    • Affordability

  2. Noarlunga

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Murray Bridge

Stable entry · room to scale

9.2%/yr capital growth, population +6.5% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.2%/yr
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.2%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Noarlunga

Stable entry point

10.8%/yr capital growth, 4.4% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Capital growth10.8%/yr
  • Rental yield4.4%
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state