Back to results

Victor Harbor vs Reynella — which is best for rental demand?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $700kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Victor Harbor

    SA · 5211
    46Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    9.4%/yr
    GrowthThin market · ~5k residents

  2. Reynella

    SA · 5161
    56Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Victor Harbor
Reynella
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
949.4%/yr
989.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
472.3%
522.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
4411.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1515% under cap
88% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Victor Harbor

    1/8
    • Affordability

  2. Reynella

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Victor Harbor

Thin market · ~5k residents

9.4%/yr capital growth, population +6.5% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.4%/yr
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 4,520 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • Thin gross yield (2.3%)

Why Reynella

Stable but fully priced

9.8%/yr capital growth, tight 1.2% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (92% of cap)
  • No major construction project in this state