Back to results

Albion vs Reynella — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $800kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Albion

    VIC · 3020
    47Average
    Median
    $713k
    5y growth
    1.1%/yr
    BalancedLate-cycle hold

  2. Reynella

    SA · 5161
    57Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Albion
Reynella
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
111.1%/yr
989.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
442.2%
522.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
651.4%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
52$2.6bn
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1111% under cap
1919% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Albion

    4/8
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Construction pipeline
    • Supply tightening

  2. Reynella

    4/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Affordability

Why Albion

Late-cycle hold

listings tightening 6.0% YoY, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Tight rentals1.4%
  • Income growth+16.0% (5y)
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.2%)
  • Modest 5y growth (1.1%/yr)

Construction ·Melbourne Airport Rail — Sunshine Hub1.9 kmApproved · 2033

Why Reynella

Stable entry point

9.8%/yr capital growth, tight 1.2% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state