Back to results

Angus vs Reynella — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $800kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Angus

    NSW · 2765
    58Average
    Median
    $225k
    5y growth
    5.0%/yr
    YieldStable entry · room to scale

  2. Reynella

    SA · 5161
    57Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    9.8%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Angus
Reynella
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
505.0%/yr
989.8%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
1008.1%
522.6%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
701.2%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6015.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
7272% under cap
1919% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
75-5.0% YoY
70-4.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Angus

    5/8
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

  2. Reynella

    2/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental demand

Why Angus

Stable entry · room to scale

8.1% gross yield, listings tightening 5.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Rental yield8.1%
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Budget headroom72% under cap
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·M12 Motorway19.5 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Reynella

Stable entry point

9.8%/yr capital growth, tight 1.2% vacancy.

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.8%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.2%
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state