Back to results

Frankston North vs Macgregor — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $800kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Frankston North

    VIC · 3200
    55Average
    Median
    $591k
    5y growth
    6.9%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Macgregor

    ACT · 2615
    58Average
    Median
    $695k
    5y growth
    8.2%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Frankston North
Macgregor
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
696.9%/yr
828.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
552.8%
693.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
651.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
919.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2626% under cap
1313% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
65-3.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Frankston North

    3/8
    • Rental demand
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

  2. Macgregor

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Population growth

Why Frankston North

Stable entry point

listings tightening 6.0% YoY, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Capital growth6.9%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Cheltenham19.7 kmConstruction · 2035

Why Macgregor

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 8.2%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Capital growth8.2%/yr
  • Rental yield3.5%
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state