Back to results

Murray Bridge vs Whyalla — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $800kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Murray Bridge

    SA · 5253
    53Average
    Median
    $395k
    5y growth
    9.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry · room to scale

  2. Whyalla

    SA · 5600
    44Below trend
    Median
    $245k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    BalancedThin market · ~4k residents

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Murray Bridge
Whyalla
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
929.2%/yr
727.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
633.2%
854.2%
Rental demand
weight 10%
402.4%
402.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
656.5%
656.5%
Income growth
weight 12%
4411.0%
4411.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
5151% under cap
6969% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
40+2.0% YoY
40+2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Murray Bridge

    1/8
    • Capital growth (5y)

  2. Whyalla

    2/8
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Murray Bridge

Stable entry · room to scale

9.2%/yr capital growth, population +6.5% (5y).

Drivers
  • Capital growth9.2%/yr
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.2%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Whyalla

Thin market · ~4k residents

4.2% gross yield, 7.2%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Rental yield4.2%
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
  • Budget headroom69% under cap
  • Population growth+6.5% (5y)
Risks
  • Only 3,609 residents — illiquid, slow to sell
  • No major construction project in this state