Back to results

Bakewell vs Larrakeyah — which is best for growth?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bakewell

    NT · 0832
    48Average
    Median
    $595k
    5y growth
    5.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Larrakeyah

    NT · 0820
    36Below trend
    Median
    $845k
    5y growth
    3.4%/yr
    BalancedStable but fully priced

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bakewell
Larrakeyah
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
585.8%/yr
343.4%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
663.3%
492.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
502.0%
382.5%
Population growth
weight 12%
717.1%
717.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5614.0%
4812.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
3434% under cap
66% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
500.0% YoY
40+2.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bakewell

    6/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Rental demand
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

  2. Larrakeyah

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

Why Bakewell

Stable entry point

population +7.1% (5y), 3.3% gross yield.

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
  • Rental yield3.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Larrakeyah

Stable but fully priced

population +7.1% (5y).

Drivers
  • Population growth+7.1% (5y)
Risks
  • At top of budget (94% of cap)
  • Thin gross yield (2.4%)