Back to results

Bonython vs Macgregor — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Bonython

    ACT · 2905
    56Average
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    7.8%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

  2. Macgregor

    ACT · 2615
    59Average
    Median
    $695k
    5y growth
    8.2%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Bonython
Macgregor
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
787.8%/yr
828.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
623.1%
693.5%
Rental demand
weight 10%
651.4%
651.4%
Population growth
weight 12%
919.1%
919.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
6015.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1717% under cap
2323% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
60-2.0% YoY
65-3.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Bonython

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Macgregor

    5/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Income growth
    • Affordability
    • Supply tightening

Why Bonython

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 7.8%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Capital growth7.8%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.4%
  • Rental yield3.1%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Why Macgregor

Stable entry point

population +9.1% (5y), 8.2%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Population growth+9.1% (5y)
  • Capital growth8.2%/yr
  • Rental yield3.5%
  • Tight rentals1.4%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state