Back to results

Dandenong vs Frankston North — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Dandenong

    VIC · 3175
    53Average
    Median
    $745k
    5y growth
    6.9%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

  2. Frankston North

    VIC · 3200
    55Average
    Median
    $591k
    5y growth
    6.9%/yr
    BalancedStable entry point

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Dandenong
Frankston North
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
696.9%/yr
696.9%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
452.2%
552.8%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
787.8%
787.8%
Income growth
weight 12%
6416.0%
6416.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
1717% under cap
3434% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
80-6.0% YoY
80-6.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Dandenong

    0/8

    No outright lead on any single dimension.

  2. Frankston North

    3/8
    • Capital growth (5y)
    • Rental yield
    • Affordability

Why Dandenong

Growth-led, low cashflow

listings tightening 6.0% YoY, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Capital growth6.9%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.2%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Clayton10.8 kmConstruction · 2035

Why Frankston North

Stable entry point

listings tightening 6.0% YoY, population +7.8% (5y).

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-6.0% YoY
  • Population growth+7.8% (5y)
  • Capital growth6.9%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Suburban Rail Loop East — Cheltenham19.7 kmConstruction · 2035