Back to results

Glenorchy vs Warrane — which is best for yield?

Same eight metrics, scored against the same benchmark, ranked against a $900kbudget. Look for where one suburb is materially ahead — that's the dimension that should sway your call.

  1. Glenorchy

    TAS · 7010
    47Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    GrowthStable entry point

  2. Warrane

    TAS · 7018
    48Average
    Median
    $645k
    5y growth
    7.2%/yr
    GrowthGrowth-led, low cashflow

Metric breakdown

Each row scores 0–100 against a fixed benchmark. The leader on each row is highlighted.

Metric · weight
Glenorchy
Warrane
Capital growth (5y)
weight 22%
727.2%/yr
727.2%/yr
Rental yield
weight 13%
522.6%
482.4%
Rental demand
weight 10%
681.3%
681.3%
Population growth
weight 12%
313.1%
313.1%
Income growth
weight 12%
5213.0%
5614.0%
Construction pipeline
weight 15%
0–
0–
Affordability
weight 8%
2828% under cap
2828% under cap
Supply tightening
weight 8%
70-4.0% YoY
75-5.0% YoY

Winner per dimension

Where each suburb leads the field, with the count of dimensions won.

  1. Glenorchy

    1/8
    • Rental yield

  2. Warrane

    2/8
    • Income growth
    • Supply tightening

Why Glenorchy

Stable entry point

7.2%/yr capital growth, listings tightening 4.0% YoY.

Drivers
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
  • Supply tightening-4.0% YoY
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Royal Hobart Hospital — Stage 36.4 kmConstruction · 2026

Why Warrane

Growth-led, low cashflow

listings tightening 5.0% YoY, 7.2%/yr capital growth.

Drivers
  • Supply tightening-5.0% YoY
  • Capital growth7.2%/yr
  • Tight rentals1.3%
Risks
  • Thin gross yield (2.4%)
  • No major construction project in this state

Construction ·Macquarie Point Stadium3.8 kmPlanned · 2029